This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Tyndale Bulletin
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Dissertation summaries
    • Journal articles
    • Special items
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Subscribe
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Bluesky (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:21113/feed
P-ISSN 0082-7118
E-ISSN 2752-7042
Journal articles
Vol. 71, Issue 2, 2020November 01, 2020 BST

The Patristic Roots of Satisfaction Atonement Theories: Did the Church Fathers Affirm Only Christus Victor?

James David Meyer,
christus victoraulénanselmsatisfactionatonementdoctrineearly christianitypatristicshistorical theology
https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.27751
Photo by Greg Rosenke on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 71, Issue 2, 2020

Vol. 71, Issue 2, 2020
  • The Antiquity of Psalter Shape Efforts
    Steffen Jenkins
  • Hosea 4 and 11, and the Structure of Hosea
    John Goldingay
  • ‘Show Me the Money’: Jesus, Visual Aids, and the Tribute Question
    N. Clayton Croy
  • Dating Luke-Acts Further Arguments for an Early Date
    David Seccombe
  • The Influence of the Murder Commandment in 1 Corinthians
    Brian S. RosnerWilliam Andrew Williamson
  • The Typological Expectation of Psalm 68 and its Application in Ephesians 4:8
    Joshua M. Greever
  • The Punctuation of Hebrews 10:2 and its Significance for the Date of Hebrews
    Philip Church
  • The Patristic Roots of Satisfaction Atonement Theories: Did the Church Fathers Affirm Only _Christus Victor_?
    James David Meyer
Tyndale Bulletin
Meyer, James David. 2020. “The Patristic Roots of Satisfaction Atonement Theories: Did the Church Fathers Affirm Only Christus Victor?” Tyndale Bulletin 71 (2): 293–319. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.27751.
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system