P-ISSN 0082-7118
E-ISSN 2752-7042
Vol. 57, Issue 2, 2006November 01, 2006 BST
What Do Ancient Historians Make of the New Testament?
What Do Ancient Historians Make of the New Testament?
Articles in Vol. 57, Issue 2, 2006
Vol. 57, Issue 2, 2006
- Psalm 4: Ambiguity and ResolutionJohn Goldingay
- A Rhetorical Analysis of Jeremiah 7:1-15Michael Avioz
- God's Hidden CompassionLena-Sofia Tiemeyer
- Is the Messiah Announced in Malachi 3:1?Andrew S. Malone
- One or Two Views of Judaism: Paul in Acts 28 and Romans 11 on Jewish UnbeliefKenneth D. Litwak
- Living Like the Azazel Goat in Romans 12:1bNobuyoshi Kiuchi
- The Question of Hell and Salvation: Is There a Fourth View?Stephen Williams
- What Do Ancient Historians Make of the New Testament?Alanna Nobbs
- Rehabilitating Gallio and His Judgement in Acts 18:14-15Bruce Winter
- A Search for Cohesion in the Book of Revelation, with Specific Reference to Chapter OneIwan Whiteley
- A Critical Analysis of the Present State of Synagogue Research and its Implications for the Study of Luke-ActsStephen Catto
- 'Not Made with Tracing Paper': Studies in the Septuagint of ZechariahJames K. Palmer
Nobbs, Alanna. 2006. “What Do Ancient Historians Make of the New Testament?” Tyndale Bulletin 57 (2): 285–90. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.29219.
